Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 05:54

Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Kroger Faces Backlash as Juneteenth Cakes Go Viral - Newser
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Thank you.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
US tycoon pours $100mn into Trump crypto project after SEC reprieve - Financial Times
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Grooming gang victims' concerns weren't dismissed, Reeves says - BBC
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Dana White names the only fighter Jon Jones ever ducked and it’s not Tom Aspinall - Bloody Elbow
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
What’s next?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
346 Million-Year-Old Fossil Rewrites the Story of Life on Land - SciTechDaily
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
State of Play Confirmed for 4th June, 40+ Minutes of PS5 Games - Push Square
Russia can stop this any time.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.